Lewis concludes appendix ii by noting that the study of logic is best served by focusing on systems weaker than s5 and not exclusively on s5. The language of modal logic s5 is obtained by adding to the language of propositional logic the two modal operators and. It is necessarily true that a means that things being as they are, a must be true, e. Among the above systems, s4 has important significance since the intuitionistic propositional calculus can be interpreted in it, that is, with respect to every propositional non modal formula it is possible to construct a formula of modal logic such that. Handout 3 extensions of k t, b, s4, s5 february 712. Two of these systems, s4 and s5 are still in use today. Suppose that we have made a measurement for example, that some velocity vis 50. The standard system of deduction in rstorder modal logic is normal modal logic, denoted k, which consists of all the inference rules and axiom schema of rstorder logic,3 plus the following rule and scheme. Example the modal logic s4 which is the normal modal logic kt4 in the standard. The language l plphas the following list of symbols as alphabet.
Deep inference is induced by the methods applied so. Mar 12, 2014 the distinctive principle of s5 modal logic is a principle that was first annunciated by the medieval philosopher john duns scotus. Can anyone give a good simple explanation of s5 modal logic. In this section, we recall the axiomatic formulation and the kripke semantic of modal logic s5. Categorical and kripke semantics for constructive s4 modal. Modal logics the modal logics s4 and s5 semantic entailment.
Natural deduction for full s5 modal logic with weak normalization. Modern origins of modal logic stanford encyclopedia of. A deep inference system for the modal logic s5 phiniki stouppa. A a, and the modal logic s5 kt4e is obtained from kt4 s4 by.
Every finitely axiomatizable modal logic with the finite model property is decidable. Modal logic is, strictly speaking, the study of the deductive behavior of the. A loopfree decision procedure for modal propositional logics. Covers propositional modal logic only, but has a very complete discussion of the various systems that come between k and s5.
Easy speed math they dont teach you in school part 1 addition duration. The archetypical example of a modal logic, often taken to be the default example, is a system, called s4 modal logic or some slight variants s1, s2, of it, that aims to model the idea of propositions being possibly true or necessarily true. One should note that in some modal logics, like s4 ghilardi and zawadowski 1995, for some choices of. Completeness in modal logic sebastian enqvist 8210234111. Feel free to appeal to any theorems, corollaries, etc. The propositional logic of metaphysical modality has been assumed to be at least as strong as the system t and to be no stronger than the system s5. It covers i basic approaches to logic, including proof theory and especially model theory, ii extensions of standard logic such as modal logic that are important in philosophy, and.
The strong modal operator is symbolized by the box, while the weak modal operator is symbolized by the diamond. We say that a modal logic is consistent iff it is a proper subset of l. The procedure is based on the method of socratic proofs for modal logics, which is grounded in the logic of questions iel. For example, one can prove that historical system s5 is equivalent to kt5, and that historical system b is equivalent to kdb. It shows how the tree or tableau method provides a simple and easily comprehensible decision procedure for systems such as k. It has been much argued that s4 is a true logic of knowledge.
An extension of propositional calculus with operators that express various modes of truth. Chapter 1 topology and epistemic logic rohit parikh department of computer science, brooklyn college, and departments of computer sci. D originally comes from deontic, since this postulate was most prominent in deontic logic, the logic of. This book is an introduction to logic for students of contemporary philosophy. One can also show that s5 is equivalent to system l. Pdf the aim of this work is to define a resolution method for the modal logic s5. In modal logic, the systems s4 and s5 are seen as necessary extensions to the system m as they iterate the principles of necessity and possibility and result in a stronger notions of those principles. The procedure is based on the method of socratic proofs for modal logics, which is. Modality, s4, origin essentialism, fivedimensionalism, impossible world. This ongoing research aims at proving the conjecture. The fuzzy variant s 5 c of the wellknown modal logic s5 is studied, c being a recursively axiomatized fuzzy propositional logic extending the basic fuzzy logic bl.
It shows how the tree or tableau method provides a simple and easily comprehensible decision procedure for systems such as k, t, s4 and s5. We give a uniform proof for the modal logics which are characterized by symmetric, transitive. Recall that modal logics tend to be much easier than. For example, the statement john is happy might be qualified by saying that john is usually happy, in which case the term usually is functioning as a modal. It is a normal modal logic, and one of the oldest systems of modal logic of any kind.
The meaning of set forth in this section is that of epistemic modal logic in a logic of knowledge. Modal logic s5 article about modal logic s5 by the free. If you want a proof in terms of kripke semantics, every s5 model is also an s4 model, because the accessibility relation for s5 is more constrained. This paper surveys the main concepts and systems of modal logic. We list and discuss further examples of modal logic in more detail below in examples.
System s5 adds axiom c11, or alternatively c10 and c12, to the basis of s1. Modal logic is, strictly speaking, the study of the deductive behavior of the expressions it is necessary that and it is possible that. Pdf a resolution method for modal logic s5 researchgate. Deep inference is induced by the methods applied so far in conceptually pure systems for this logic. Modal logic is a type of formal logic primarily developed in the 1960s that extends classical propositional and predicate logic to include operators expressing modality.
Lewis, an early 20thcentury pioneer in modal logic. As we will see there is a complete version of the curryhoward isomorphism for it. Given an s4 logic m, the modal components of mconstitute a dense sublattice of nexts4 with the top element m\grz. The present paper attempts to extend the results of l, in the domain of the propositional calculus, to a class of modal systems called normal. Prominent modal logics are constructed from a weak logic called k after saul kripke. A cutfreegentzenstylesequentcalculusfor the modal logics5. Systems of modal logic department of computing imperial. Lewis is wellknown for trying to define a modally robust conditional that would.
Semantical analysis of modal logic i normal modal propositional calculi by saul a. Another introductory formal text that places fairly high demands on the reader. Categorical and kripke semantics for constructive s4 modal logic. The aim of this paper is to present a loopfree decision procedure for modal propositional logics k4, s4 and s5. This work revealed that s4 and s5 are models of interior algebra, a proper extension of boolean algebra originally designed to capture the properties of the interior and closure operators of topology.
The modal logic s4 kt4 is obtained from kt by adding the axiom schema. The latter example shows that, in general, the set of axioms used to generate the normal modal logic is not. A modal is an expression like necessarily or possibly that is used to qualify the truth of a judgement. The first two are straightforward and are left as an exercise tutorial sheet. In this paper, our concern is the fragment of the modal language that com. Note that by definition, k is an axiom of any such logic. Our proof will indicate that motohashis method can be applied to a wide range of modal logics, including s5 as well as s4. We show that in standard situations, when the base epistemic systems are t, s4, and s5, the resulting justified common knowledge systems are normal modal logics, which places them within the scope. Introduction s5 is the most popular modal logical system among modal metaphysicians. Lewis is wellknown for trying to define a modally robust.
Normalizable natural deduction rules for s4 modal operatorsa,world congress on universal logic,montreux,2005, 7980. Fitch, naive modal logic, unpublished lecture notes. It is well known 17 that the logic pm5 corresponds to the modal s5, the pretabularity. Completeness in modal logic sebastian enqvist 8210234111 course. Texts on modal logic typically do little more than mention its connections with the study of boolean algebras and topology. Prove that modal logic s4 is properly contained in s5. This is an advanced 2001 textbook on modal logic, a field which caught the attention of computer scientists in the late 1970s. The logic s4, or kt4, is characterized by axioms t and. The logic pm5 coincides with the modal system s5 and is characterized by the class of scales of depth 1, which are cluster of a. March 1, 2006 abstract we present a cutadmissible system for the modal logic s5 in a formalism that makes explicit and intensive use of deep inference.
Three kinds of kripke models are introduced and corresponding deductive systems are found. However, the term modal logic may be used more broadly for a family of. In logic and philosophy, s5 is one of five systems of modal logic proposed by clarence irving lewis and cooper harold langford in their 1932 book symbolic logic. The distinctive principle of s5 modal logic is a principle that was first annunciated by the medieval philosopher john duns scotus. Aug 16, 2008 the aim of this paper is to present a loopfree decision procedure for modal propositional logics k4, s4 and s5. It is formed with propositional calculus formulas and tautologies, and inference apparatus with substitution and modus ponens, but extending the. We first propose a conjunctive normal form s5cnf which is. A loopfree decision procedure for modal propositional. It covers i basic approaches to logic, including proof theory and especially model theory, ii extensions of standard logic such as modal logic that are important in philosophy, and iii some elementary philosophy of logic. Some systems also have historical names t, b, s4, s4. Given propositional logic, we can axiomatize t as follows. This book presupposes that readers know the attractions and power of this approach, including the notions of logical syntax, semantics, proof, and metatheory of formal systems. We say that a modal logic is consistent iff it is a proper subset of l, i.
Show that the canonical modal for the modal logic s4. Tools and techniques in modal logic marcus kracht ii. S4s5 6,7,8,1,2,16, normalizable natural deduction systems for intuitionistic modal logics 12,5 and for full classical s4 3, but not for full s5. We prove that the procedure terminates and that it is sound and complete. Natural deduction for full s5 modal logic with weak.
853 1165 460 310 259 1413 1330 702 1338 761 1398 731 269 73 1177 1480 601 839 561 736 1503 256 113 882 1457 550 463 347 1149 1220 690 718 1276 429 1022 1142 767 388 957 1211 1169 974